UK lacks skills to deliver major infrastructure, report warns

The government and wider economy lack the skills and capacity to deliver ambitious plans for major infrastructure over the next five years, according to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC). 

In a new report, the PAC calls for the government to set out how it will address these issues and ensure future projects offer long-term value for taxpayers’ money.

The PAC findings show skills shortages in technical and engineering disciplines are set to worsen as gaps in the UK’s workforce are compounded by competition from major global development projects. 

Project management and design are also areas of concern, particularly for skilled professionals in senior positions.  

Of 16,000 project professionals that need to gain accreditation from the government’s major project leadership academy, only 1,000 had done so at the time of the PAC’s report, which warns that failure to build market capacity could result in higher prices for scarce skills.

Commenting on the report, Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the PAC, said: “Over the coming years, government spending on major infrastructure projects is set to rise to unprecedented levels. Such projects present unique and novel challenges which government must navigate if it is to secure value for public money. 

“Without a robust market for essential skills in place, these are challenges the UK will fail to meet, as shortages push costs up in a globally competitive environment.”

In March 2023, the government’s major projects portfolio included 244 projects with an estimated total whole-life cost of £805 billion. The PAC’s inquiry heard that this scale of investment is unprecedented and projected spend over the next five years is very high as the government looks to develop sectors including road, rail and energy.

Despite this level of investment, the PAC believes government departments are failing to devote the time and effort needed to ensure they maximise the value that comes from projects. Only 8% of the £432 billion spend on major projects in 2019 had robust impact evaluation plans in place and around two-thirds had no plans at all. 

The report also highlights good examples of effective cross-government working. However, the PAC believes more must be done to incentivise departments to work together to ensure this practice becomes systemic across all departments.

Hillier added: “All too often we see projects and programmes that are poorly managed and delivered late and over budget. The failure to ensure projects have robust impact evaluation plans in place is symptomatic of the short-term mentality dominating these processes. 

“The government must encourage cross-departmental learning if we are to avoid repeating past mistakes.”